2 thoughts on “What should I do if the bank interviews can’t grab the topic”
Howard
Do you say that when the non -leadership group discusses the topic freely, try to speak as much as possible. It is really not possible to say that at this time you can be a recorder of time and other people’s speeches. Then properly summarize the views of others. The financial banks will adopt discussions without leadership groups, especially some commercial banks, such as: CITIC Bank, China Merchants Bank, etc., and even Agricultural Bank of China and the Bank of China have adopted the form of interviews discussed by non -leadership groups. In order to improve the efficiency of the interview, many banks are interested in shortening the interview time as much as possible. Sometimes they will directly remove their personal statements, enter the discussion link, and even have as many applicants as possible in each group. Therefore, in recent years, interviews without leadership groups have been presenting: short time, many people’s examination trends. The question comes: a group of 13 people, 15 minutes of discussion time, no personal statement time, (the Agricultural Bank of China has adopted this method). Those who have been in the examination room for a while, and what happened without reaction, the exam is over. How can we stand out during the fast -paced interview and strive for more opportunities for speaking? Teacher Qi, come to give you some suggestions: First, sort out materials and questions when thinking, list outlines according to the classification of question types, answering ideas, and own knowledge reserves, and list your own arguments with keywords. It can be the Taoist argumentation and examples of examples. Secondly, during the discussion process, the first speech as much as possible, to say your understanding and view of the topic, and put forward the discussion plan to promote the efficient discussion. (There is no personal statement) If there is a personal statement, it must be clearly analyzed to the topic and tells his own conclusions. When other team members publish personal statements, they must make a table record, summarize the characteristics of all people, and strive for the first speech in the later free discussion. Third, there is no need to be discouraged if there is no “grabbing” to the first speech, because there are many opportunities in the back we can grasp it. The key should be listened to what other team members say. Fourth, when we encounter the same group member as our own point of view, we have to observe when he will end, who is probably the same as his wishes, who is different from his wishes. We must be in this group. After expressing his views, the opinion of his view can be sure of his speech, and use his accumulated example to supplement the speech. Fifth, when we encounter a team member different from our own point of view, we have to listen to where he is different, and we think about the refutation argument as much as possible. When the team member speaks, we can be sure of his point of view It is advisable to say a refutation argument. Sixth, when the two sides are deadlocked, on the one hand, we must make a record, on the other hand, we must find the focus of dispute to persuade, try to soothe emotions, and remind everyone to grasp the time. Seventh, staged summary. You can divide the discussion time into three paragraphs, front, middle, and afterwards, find opportunities for speaking, summarize each stage, propose a plan for promoting discussions, and guide the group discussion. (Maybe everyone will depend on the situation.) The eighth, if there are students who have not expressed their opinions after the discussion, we can suggest that the team members who have not expressed their opinions to express their opinions to reflect their team consciousness. Ninth, remind the discussion time, and grasp the process of discussion in the group. Is with these, we can also strive for at least 4 or 5 effective opportunities in the panic test room, but there are some points that need to be paid attention to:
It is not necessary to grab the topic, and to speak your own opinion on the topic in the conversation. Although more speeches will let the interviewer notice you, you still need to look at the language logic. Do you really understand this topic? Strong.
Do you say that when the non -leadership group discusses the topic freely, try to speak as much as possible. It is really not possible to say that at this time you can be a recorder of time and other people’s speeches. Then properly summarize the views of others.
The financial banks will adopt discussions without leadership groups, especially some commercial banks, such as: CITIC Bank, China Merchants Bank, etc., and even Agricultural Bank of China and the Bank of China have adopted the form of interviews discussed by non -leadership groups. In order to improve the efficiency of the interview, many banks are interested in shortening the interview time as much as possible. Sometimes they will directly remove their personal statements, enter the discussion link, and even have as many applicants as possible in each group. Therefore, in recent years, interviews without leadership groups have been presenting: short time, many people’s examination trends.
The question comes: a group of 13 people, 15 minutes of discussion time, no personal statement time, (the Agricultural Bank of China has adopted this method). Those who have been in the examination room for a while, and what happened without reaction, the exam is over. How can we stand out during the fast -paced interview and strive for more opportunities for speaking? Teacher Qi, come to give you some suggestions:
First, sort out materials and questions when thinking, list outlines according to the classification of question types, answering ideas, and own knowledge reserves, and list your own arguments with keywords. It can be the Taoist argumentation and examples of examples.
Secondly, during the discussion process, the first speech as much as possible, to say your understanding and view of the topic, and put forward the discussion plan to promote the efficient discussion. (There is no personal statement) If there is a personal statement, it must be clearly analyzed to the topic and tells his own conclusions. When other team members publish personal statements, they must make a table record, summarize the characteristics of all people, and strive for the first speech in the later free discussion.
Third, there is no need to be discouraged if there is no “grabbing” to the first speech, because there are many opportunities in the back we can grasp it. The key should be listened to what other team members say.
Fourth, when we encounter the same group member as our own point of view, we have to observe when he will end, who is probably the same as his wishes, who is different from his wishes. We must be in this group. After expressing his views, the opinion of his view can be sure of his speech, and use his accumulated example to supplement the speech.
Fifth, when we encounter a team member different from our own point of view, we have to listen to where he is different, and we think about the refutation argument as much as possible. When the team member speaks, we can be sure of his point of view It is advisable to say a refutation argument.
Sixth, when the two sides are deadlocked, on the one hand, we must make a record, on the other hand, we must find the focus of dispute to persuade, try to soothe emotions, and remind everyone to grasp the time.
Seventh, staged summary. You can divide the discussion time into three paragraphs, front, middle, and afterwards, find opportunities for speaking, summarize each stage, propose a plan for promoting discussions, and guide the group discussion. (Maybe everyone will depend on the situation.)
The eighth, if there are students who have not expressed their opinions after the discussion, we can suggest that the team members who have not expressed their opinions to express their opinions to reflect their team consciousness.
Ninth, remind the discussion time, and grasp the process of discussion in the group.
Is with these, we can also strive for at least 4 or 5 effective opportunities in the panic test room, but there are some points that need to be paid attention to:
It is not necessary to grab the topic, and to speak your own opinion on the topic in the conversation. Although more speeches will let the interviewer notice you, you still need to look at the language logic. Do you really understand this topic? Strong.