1 thought on “What are the main performances of the income gap”
Elias
At present, the gap between Chinese national income has increased, and workers at the bottom are very hard. At the beginning of the year, a migrant worker mentioned that he went home for a year after a year and had a half -year savings. This has become a serious social problem and exacerbated the imbalance of the economic structure. The phenomenon of income gap between Chinese residents has expanded, and the most prominent manifestation is the expansion of residents’ income gap between different regions. From the country, the gap between the income of residents in the eastern region and the central and western regions has expanded. The income gap between residents in different regions in one province also has a significant expansion. The fundamental reason for the expansion of the regional gap is the difference in economic development. The expansion in China has occurred in the process of high -speed growth in various regions, and it is a problem. Of course, we can’t take it lightly because of the problems in the process. The central government has taken strong measures for many years to promote economic development in underdeveloped regions. This gap between the rich and the poor and realizing social fairness are one of the hottest topics in the “two sessions” this year. Since the reform and opening up, the income of residents in my country has generally improved, and life has improved greatly. However, at the same time, the gap between income is gradually increasing or even different, becoming a major social difficulties that plagued my country’s reform and development, and directly affecting society. Construction of a harmonious society. If the gap between the rich and the poor is expanding is a hurdle in the process of economic development, then it effectively curbs the gap between the rich and the poor, and reasonably takes into account efficiency and fairness. Socialist harmonious society must solve problems. The government has invested a lot of determination in the process of resolving the income gap between some social members. The current income distribution status in my country has transformed from excessive average before reform and opening up to too much gap, and there are many phenomena of unbuttered allocation. These phenomena are mainly manifested in the following aspects: 1 is the dual -track system of labor price. Under the conditions of market economy, the same positions and similar quality workers should have the same income level no matter what corporate work in the same area. But this is not the case. This phenomenon is essentially the dual -track system of labor prices, that is, two labor prices: marketization and non -market -oriented. The unfairness of the dual -rail system in the market economy is obvious. Similarly, the dual -track system of labor prices is obviously unfair to workers with different rails. If, the state -owned monopoly industry’s income is significantly high. It is a normal phenomenon that there is a certain income gap between industries, but the problem is that the state -owned monopoly industry has always maintained a high level of income from a competitive industry, which is unhappy. This may be that the institutional arrangement is unreasonable, or it may be a problem in the implementation of the system. The third is the low income of migrant workers. There is a long time in my country that there is a problem of excessive income gap between urban and rural areas and workers and peasants. In the past ten years, both per capita GDP or the living standards of urban and rural people have increased significantly, but the increase in wages of migrant workers has not increased significantly. This situation has made it difficult for companies to use more migrant workers to recruit workers. So how can we reduce the income gap? Personally, I should improve it from the following aspects: The construction of a harmonious society, expand the proportion of income people must work hard: First, to maintain the sustainable and rapid development of the national economy. “Development is the last word”. Only by developing can the cake be greater and must seize all opportunities to accelerate development. This is a macro guarantee for expanding the proportion of middle -income people. Secondly, we must further improve the legal system to protect private property. “People have no constant production without perseverance.” Private legal property is effectively protected by the law, which will provide strong guarantee for the majority of people to create wealth and increase income, so that more people become middle -income people. Third, increase the income of farmers’ income in prominent positions. At the present stage of the most population of my country’s population, the key to expanding the proportion of middle -income people is to increase the income of farmers’ income. Fourth, we must do everything possible to expand employment. Employment is the foundation of people’s livelihood and an important way to increase residents’ income. The government must work hard to provide the general opportunities for most people to obtain higher income. Fifth, strive to protect the right to educate every member of the society. To protect the right to educate each social member is to provide them with opportunities for equality and justice, so that every social member has the ability to participate in economic development and social development, so that everyone has the opportunity to become middle -income people. Sixth, it is necessary to reasonably distribute the relationship. The first distribution should pay attention to efficiency, and then allocate should be fair. It is necessary to protect legal income, crack down on illegal income, adjust too high income, and support vulnerable groups. Finally, it is necessary to promote saving in the whole society and reduce waste
1. The expansion of the income gap between urban and rural residents is actually a reflection of the dual economic structure. The industry engaged in farmers is traditional agriculture, and the labor productivity of traditional agriculture is relatively low. In many cases, they can only “maintain their livelihood.” Low farmers’ income is the product of traditional agriculture. The industries that urban residents are engaged in are modern manufacturing, information industry and service industry. The labor productivity of modern industries is high, and employees can get higher wage income. Therefore, in this sense, it can be said that the income gap between urban and rural residents is the product of the dual economic structure. There are two correct policy ideas: one is to transform traditional industries into modern industries, so as to fundamentally increase farmers’ income level; second, to transfer a large number of remaining labor in traditional industries to the modern industry of the city, thereby increasing them Income level. The problem now is that the speed of traditional agriculture has become the speed of modern industries, and the surplus labor transfer of agriculture has encountered some difficulties. The central government has discovered these issues, attaches great importance to the issue of “agriculture, rural areas, and rural areas, and the cancellation of a series of powerful measures such as agricultural taxes has played an important role in fundamentally narrowing the income gap between urban and rural residents. 2. The third manifestation of the income gap between residents in my country is that the income gap between the richer group and the poor group in urban residents expanded; The gap has expanded. This is the phenomenon that the income gap that is most concerned about. The reasons for the income gap between the rich group and the poor group are different. First, the factors such as assets are different, and as the development of the market economy, the non -labor income brought by the factors such as assets may still Increasing, this enables the gap between groups that can obtain non -labor income and the income of poor groups to continue to expand. Second, how much human capital investment is different. The difference between human capital investment is the difference between wage income is an economic and social phenomenon that is common in countries around the world. With the development of the labor market, the differences in income caused by the gap between human capital investment are becoming more and more obvious. This difference is manifested in whether you can find a job and a salary income. Third, the income gap caused by the system and other reasons. The current employment system and social security system are not reasonable, and it may cause higher income of certain groups and lower income of certain groups. From this conclusion, the fundamental reason for the difference in income is the issue of economic development, not the reform of market orientation. The most prominent problem is not the unfair income, but the inequality of the opportunity. The key is to improve fairness in the equality of opportunities. The key lies in two aspects: one is effective market mechanism, and the other is a reasonable policy mechanism. The key to improve fairness in the equality of opportunities is two aspects: one is effective market mechanism, and the other is a reasonable policy mechanism. The current income distribution is not public. First of all, the market platform is unfair, far from forming a market pattern of unified openness and orderly competition. If the current factors market does not market, the gap between the four requirements of unified, open, competition, and orderly. The labor market is still blocked by the dual system of the urban and rural system, the land market is constrained by blurred property rights, and the capital market is affected by several discrimination policies. Even in the market mechanism is operating well, the income distribution pattern it brings cannot be said to be correct, reasonable, fair or moral. The market competition mechanism itself has the characteristics of exacerbating the gap between the rich and the poor. Therefore, the government has the responsibility to remedy the excessive income gap through policy and mechanisms, such as assistance to the weak, curbing monopoly, and regulating income to improve fairness. Opportunity Equality Core is to ensure education opportunities, employment opportunities, and fair starting point The right to advance the opportunity to promote equal competition in the system. The core is to ensure education opportunities, employment opportunities, and social security in terms of system The starting point is fair. E everyone’s ability is different and contributed. The reason why the contribution is different is that they have different education. Social members’ education level has a positive proportional relationship with their income, and the unevenness of education opportunities has led to a huge gap in income. Cambodia, Nepal, and Vietnam are 1/3 of China in China. They are completely free in education. China is now fully capable of making rural compulsory education for free. At the same time, training and vocational education for migrant workers and urban unemployed personnel. The nearly 800 million farmers in China, accounting for more than 60 % of the total population, but the proportion of agriculture in the economic aggregate is less than 15 %. It is estimated that there are currently 300 million to 400 million surplus labor in rural China. If a large number of people squeezed on a small piece of land will not change, how can Chinese farmers get rich. Therefore, the process of rural labor transfer must be accelerated and they can enjoy equal employment opportunities. The social security system is very insufficient. The endowment insurance covered by workers is only 20 %, and the coverage of medical and unemployment insurance is less than 20 %. A good social security system is not only conducive to fair starting point, but also a social security valve for market competition.
At present, the gap between Chinese national income has increased, and workers at the bottom are very hard. At the beginning of the year, a migrant worker mentioned that he went home for a year after a year and had a half -year savings. This has become a serious social problem and exacerbated the imbalance of the economic structure. The phenomenon of income gap between Chinese residents has expanded, and the most prominent manifestation is the expansion of residents’ income gap between different regions. From the country, the gap between the income of residents in the eastern region and the central and western regions has expanded. The income gap between residents in different regions in one province also has a significant expansion. The fundamental reason for the expansion of the regional gap is the difference in economic development.
The expansion in China has occurred in the process of high -speed growth in various regions, and it is a problem. Of course, we can’t take it lightly because of the problems in the process. The central government has taken strong measures for many years to promote economic development in underdeveloped regions.
This gap between the rich and the poor and realizing social fairness are one of the hottest topics in the “two sessions” this year. Since the reform and opening up, the income of residents in my country has generally improved, and life has improved greatly. However, at the same time, the gap between income is gradually increasing or even different, becoming a major social difficulties that plagued my country’s reform and development, and directly affecting society. Construction of a harmonious society. If the gap between the rich and the poor is expanding is a hurdle in the process of economic development, then it effectively curbs the gap between the rich and the poor, and reasonably takes into account efficiency and fairness. Socialist harmonious society must solve problems. The government has invested a lot of determination in the process of resolving the income gap between some social members.
The current income distribution status in my country has transformed from excessive average before reform and opening up to too much gap, and there are many phenomena of unbuttered allocation. These phenomena are mainly manifested in the following aspects:
1 is the dual -track system of labor price. Under the conditions of market economy, the same positions and similar quality workers should have the same income level no matter what corporate work in the same area. But this is not the case. This phenomenon is essentially the dual -track system of labor prices, that is, two labor prices: marketization and non -market -oriented. The unfairness of the dual -rail system in the market economy is obvious. Similarly, the dual -track system of labor prices is obviously unfair to workers with different rails.
If, the state -owned monopoly industry’s income is significantly high. It is a normal phenomenon that there is a certain income gap between industries, but the problem is that the state -owned monopoly industry has always maintained a high level of income from a competitive industry, which is unhappy. This may be that the institutional arrangement is unreasonable, or it may be a problem in the implementation of the system.
The third is the low income of migrant workers. There is a long time in my country that there is a problem of excessive income gap between urban and rural areas and workers and peasants. In the past ten years, both per capita GDP or the living standards of urban and rural people have increased significantly, but the increase in wages of migrant workers has not increased significantly. This situation has made it difficult for companies to use more migrant workers to recruit workers.
So how can we reduce the income gap? Personally, I should improve it from the following aspects:
The construction of a harmonious society, expand the proportion of income people must work hard: First, to maintain the sustainable and rapid development of the national economy. “Development is the last word”. Only by developing can the cake be greater and must seize all opportunities to accelerate development. This is a macro guarantee for expanding the proportion of middle -income people. Secondly, we must further improve the legal system to protect private property. “People have no constant production without perseverance.” Private legal property is effectively protected by the law, which will provide strong guarantee for the majority of people to create wealth and increase income, so that more people become middle -income people. Third, increase the income of farmers’ income in prominent positions. At the present stage of the most population of my country’s population, the key to expanding the proportion of middle -income people is to increase the income of farmers’ income. Fourth, we must do everything possible to expand employment. Employment is the foundation of people’s livelihood and an important way to increase residents’ income. The government must work hard to provide the general opportunities for most people to obtain higher income. Fifth, strive to protect the right to educate every member of the society. To protect the right to educate each social member is to provide them with opportunities for equality and justice, so that every social member has the ability to participate in economic development and social development, so that everyone has the opportunity to become middle -income people. Sixth, it is necessary to reasonably distribute the relationship. The first distribution should pay attention to efficiency, and then allocate should be fair. It is necessary to protect legal income, crack down on illegal income, adjust too high income, and support vulnerable groups. Finally, it is necessary to promote saving in the whole society and reduce waste
1. The expansion of the income gap between urban and rural residents is actually a reflection of the dual economic structure. The industry engaged in farmers is traditional agriculture, and the labor productivity of traditional agriculture is relatively low. In many cases, they can only “maintain their livelihood.” Low farmers’ income is the product of traditional agriculture. The industries that urban residents are engaged in are modern manufacturing, information industry and service industry. The labor productivity of modern industries is high, and employees can get higher wage income. Therefore, in this sense, it can be said that the income gap between urban and rural residents is the product of the dual economic structure. There are two correct policy ideas: one is to transform traditional industries into modern industries, so as to fundamentally increase farmers’ income level; second, to transfer a large number of remaining labor in traditional industries to the modern industry of the city, thereby increasing them Income level. The problem now is that the speed of traditional agriculture has become the speed of modern industries, and the surplus labor transfer of agriculture has encountered some difficulties. The central government has discovered these issues, attaches great importance to the issue of “agriculture, rural areas, and rural areas, and the cancellation of a series of powerful measures such as agricultural taxes has played an important role in fundamentally narrowing the income gap between urban and rural residents.
2. The third manifestation of the income gap between residents in my country is that the income gap between the richer group and the poor group in urban residents expanded; The gap has expanded. This is the phenomenon that the income gap that is most concerned about.
The reasons for the income gap between the rich group and the poor group are different. First, the factors such as assets are different, and as the development of the market economy, the non -labor income brought by the factors such as assets may still Increasing, this enables the gap between groups that can obtain non -labor income and the income of poor groups to continue to expand. Second, how much human capital investment is different. The difference between human capital investment is the difference between wage income is an economic and social phenomenon that is common in countries around the world. With the development of the labor market, the differences in income caused by the gap between human capital investment are becoming more and more obvious. This difference is manifested in whether you can find a job and a salary income. Third, the income gap caused by the system and other reasons. The current employment system and social security system are not reasonable, and it may cause higher income of certain groups and lower income of certain groups. From this conclusion, the fundamental reason for the difference in income is the issue of economic development, not the reform of market orientation.
The most prominent problem is not the unfair income, but the inequality of the opportunity. The key is to improve fairness in the equality of opportunities. The key lies in two aspects: one is effective market mechanism, and the other is a reasonable policy mechanism.
The key to improve fairness in the equality of opportunities is two aspects: one is effective market mechanism, and the other is a reasonable policy mechanism.
The current income distribution is not public. First of all, the market platform is unfair, far from forming a market pattern of unified openness and orderly competition. If the current factors market does not market, the gap between the four requirements of unified, open, competition, and orderly. The labor market is still blocked by the dual system of the urban and rural system, the land market is constrained by blurred property rights, and the capital market is affected by several discrimination policies.
Even in the market mechanism is operating well, the income distribution pattern it brings cannot be said to be correct, reasonable, fair or moral. The market competition mechanism itself has the characteristics of exacerbating the gap between the rich and the poor. Therefore, the government has the responsibility to remedy the excessive income gap through policy and mechanisms, such as assistance to the weak, curbing monopoly, and regulating income to improve fairness.
Opportunity Equality Core is to ensure education opportunities, employment opportunities, and fair starting point
The right to advance the opportunity to promote equal competition in the system. The core is to ensure education opportunities, employment opportunities, and social security in terms of system The starting point is fair.
E everyone’s ability is different and contributed. The reason why the contribution is different is that they have different education. Social members’ education level has a positive proportional relationship with their income, and the unevenness of education opportunities has led to a huge gap in income. Cambodia, Nepal, and Vietnam are 1/3 of China in China. They are completely free in education. China is now fully capable of making rural compulsory education for free. At the same time, training and vocational education for migrant workers and urban unemployed personnel.
The nearly 800 million farmers in China, accounting for more than 60 % of the total population, but the proportion of agriculture in the economic aggregate is less than 15 %. It is estimated that there are currently 300 million to 400 million surplus labor in rural China. If a large number of people squeezed on a small piece of land will not change, how can Chinese farmers get rich. Therefore, the process of rural labor transfer must be accelerated and they can enjoy equal employment opportunities.
The social security system is very insufficient. The endowment insurance covered by workers is only 20 %, and the coverage of medical and unemployment insurance is less than 20 %. A good social security system is not only conducive to fair starting point, but also a social security valve for market competition.